Which case affirmed the rights of juveniles to a fair trial?

The case that affirmed the rights of juveniles to a fair trial is significant in the context of juvenile justice and constitutional law. In Re Gault established that juveniles are entitled to the same due process rights as adults when facing legal proceedings. The U.S. Supreme Court recognized that the right to a fair trial is a fundamental aspect of due process as protected by the Fourteenth Amendment.

This landmark decision addressed the inadequacies of juvenile courts, where minors previously had limited rights and often faced proceedings that did not adhere to principles of fairness. The Court ruled that juveniles should be granted the rights to receive notification of charges, to confront and cross-examine witnesses, and to legal representation. This case emphasized the importance of treating juvenile defendants equitably and highlighted the constitutional protections that apply to individuals regardless of age.

The other cases mentioned do not focus on juvenile rights in the same way. Tinker v. Des Moines dealt with free speech in schools, Brown v. Board of Education addressed racial segregation in public schools, and Plessy v. Ferguson concerned the legality of racial segregation laws. Each of these cases, while pivotal in their respective areas of law, does not pertain to the rights of juveniles in the context of fair trial proceedings.